Romans 12

Thus far, Paul has explained the Gospel and all that God has done for in Christ; now Paul will explain what affects the Gospel is to have on our life from here on out in his letter to the Romans. 

12:1-2

12:1

Here, Paul presents the order of worship for us; doctrine then duty. First, we know and meditate on doctrine then we commit ourselves to our proper duty. 

Now let’s consider doctrine briefly before we discuss duties. 
    
    What are the mercies of God that Paul speaks of in 12:1?
Everything that he has been talking about since chapter 3 really; God withholding all that we do deserve-chiefly Hell and wrath.  

    How do God’s mercies led us to worship Him?
The Christian life is founded on grace and mercy and is built up in gratitude. If God withholding you from Hellfire doesn’t care you to worship Him; then consider for a moment the reality of Hell and how hot the flames of His wrath are for unrepentant sinners and then you will have not trouble in your grateful living toward God. 

    In what way are we a “living sacrifice”?
Under the Old Covenant, God accepted the sacrifices of animals. But because of Christ’s ultimate sacrifice, the OT sacrifices are no longer of any effect. For those in Christ, the only acceptable worship is to offer themselves completely, and wholeheartedly, to the Lord. We yield ourselves, our body, to God as an instrument of righteousness. 

As long as we continue living in this body we shall continue to offer, or present, our bodies to God because of His mercies in a manner that is holy and acceptable to Him; for this, Paul tells us, is our spiritual/true worship. God is mainly concerned, not with our songs, but with our lives. 

12:2

    Let’s break down 12:2; in what way does “the world\” live?
Perhaps the “world” could be better translated “age”. That is this age is one of Godlessness. Worldliness is anything apart from God.

    How would we “conform” to this age?
By living like them; without any regard for God and His will. 

    What does it mean for us to “renew” our minds? And how do we do that?
This is the kind of transformation that can occur only as the Spirit changes our thinking through diligent study and meditation of Scripture. The renewed mind is one saturated, not with worldly things, but with the word of God. Through a renewed mind we learn the will of God.

    Speaking of the will of God; do you struggle to know the will of God for your life?

What is God’s will for our lives?
According to verse 2, to live holy lives that God approves of. 

12:3-8
12:3 
Paul speaks out of grace to his brothers. 
    Do you think your words are out of grace toward your brothers?

12:4
All members of Christ have a place. Some are different than others. 
    What’s your place in the Church?

12:5
    Do you treat your own brothers like your own body?

12:6
    How are we given these gifts?
By God and His grace; the same Electing grace that saved us is the same grace that contains our gift.

    What are we to do with or gift?
Use it. Our gifts are for the building up of the Church, not to keep to ourselves. 

As I was writing this I thought, “ok guys so what’s your gift?” but you know what that’s a horrible question. 
So here is what is going to happen: 
    I want everyone to consider what everyone else’s gift might be. We’ll start with ___ and based on what we know, or have seen from him what do you think ___’s gift is? 

Now that we have an idea of what ___’s gift is; do we see them using it and how, perhaps, could they better use it? 

12:7
“according to the grace…given”
Undeserved and merited. The gift itself, the way it is used and the results are all sovereignty chosen by the Spirt completely apart from personal merit. 

“prophecy”
The Greek word meaning “speaking forth”; doesn’t necessarily include prediction of future though it can be applied that way. More often it refers to speaking the truth of God to encourage their hearers. IE this is a reference to the skill of public proclamation of the word of God. 

“in proportion to our faith” IE the full revealed message of the Christian faith. The preacher must be careful to preach the same message as the apostles. OR it could refer to the believer’s personal understanding, or insight, regarding the Gospel. 

“ministry” Lit. Deacon. Refers to those who serve; usually in practical matters. 

“teaching” the ability to interpret, clarify, systematize and explain God’s truth clearly. Pastors must have this gift (1 Tim. 3:2) 

12:8
“exhortation” The gift which enables a believer to effectively call others to obey and follow God’s truth. It may be used negatively to admonish and correct regarding sin or positively, to encourage, comfort, strengthen struggling believers. 

    Let’s try something new this week: 
    Today I want each of you to text someone else that’s apart of our study and either positively or negatively exhort them in the faith. It can be a whole essay, or just an encouraging verse or a simple thank you. Once you have done that; just let me know who you texted and how well their exhortation was received. 

“gives” Sacrificial sharing/giving that meets the needs of others.

“liberality” Simplicity, openhearted generosity. The believer is to give with a proper attitude and to honor God not to try and virtue signal. 

“shows mercy” One who actively shows sympathy and sensitivity to those in suffering and sorrow and works to lessen their afflictions. 

“cheerfulness” This attitude is crucial to ensure that the gift of eject becomes a genuine hope, not a discouraging commiseration with those who are suffering

12:9-21
Our “renewed”, or transformed, thinking is explained in a series of short exhortations. 

12:9
“sincere”/genuine. 
    Do y’all happen to know what the Greek word for sincere means?
It means “without wax”.

    Does anyone want to guess as to why that is the meaning? Or should I just tell you? 
During the NT era, scup lutes and busts were fairly common. and they were usually rather pricey as well. Well, sometimes you’d buy a bust, have it make, bring it home and all was peachy until a hot summer day; when half of the bust’s face was melting. Some sculptors would use wax and clay, rather than just clay to form their artwork. They did this to increase their profits; but when the heat came their insincerity was revealed. 

Likewise, with us, loving people is easy when we’re in a good mood and life is peachy. But when that hot summer day comes, when the mind is going back to the old ways, or co-worker just ticked you off, or your bank just overcharged you or whatever; the point is even under pressure we are still to love truly, love without wax. 

We are sincere in our form, our outward expression of love because we are sincere in our content, our inward/heartfelt love. 

“Cling to what is good” 
    What are some good things we can cling to?

12:10 
    Can y\’all give me an example of what this verse would look like in real life?

12:11
    How is one “fervent in spirit” in “serving the Lord”?
Anything worth doing for God is worth doing with enthusiasm and care. Sloth and indifference prevent good and also allow evil to prosper. The phrase “fervent in spirit” suggests having plenty of heat to produce productive energy but not so much heat that it is uncontrollable. 

12:12
    What hope do we have that is worth rejoicing over?

    And why am I to be patient in tribulation? 
Because that tribulation is caused by God and is for my good.

    Do you find it difficult to be focused, or steadfast in prayer?
Yes.

    How can we remain focused in prayer?

12:13
We talked about hospitality last week; do I need to hit it again?

12:14
So persecution has as come, and they got me tied up and poured the gun powder into my ears, and I’ve pleaded them to repent and believe in the Lord Christ and here they come with a match in hand. 
    Now at this point; is it permissible for me to call down God’s justice/wrath upon my soon-to-be murders? 

12:15
    What’s Paul calling us to do here?
To care for our kin. Joy is best enjoyed when shared; misery made easier when shared. Love for our kin is a double-edged sword; great joys no doubt but, if we are to truly love them, we must be there when the blade cuts the other way. 

12:16
    Given our wide range of opinions let’s ask this question: is it really possible for us to live in harmony?

“don’t be high minded” we are to have a sincere, lowly love.

12:17
Paul here is speaking of an “optics check” if you will. IE 
    do you conduct yourself in a respectable manner around the heathen? 

12:18
    What are the 2 qualifications for us living at peace with all men?
If it is possible 
AND
as far as it depends on you.

That is if you cannot be at peace with all men then let it not be because you are the problem. 

12:19-20
    and while my enemy seems to triumph over me what am I to do?
Trust God, and continue loving/serving your enemy. God can and will exact perfect justice when the time comes. 

“heap coals of fire on his head” a reference to an ancient practice in which a person who wanted to show public contrition carried a pan of burins coals on his head. The coals represented the burning pain of his shame and guilt. When believers lovingly help their enemies, they should bring shame to such people for their hate.  

Romans 10

Having thoroughly proven man’s condemnation under God’s law and God’s provision of salvation for mankind Paul, in chapters 9, 10 and 11 will deal with the Jew and their present condition and their future in God’s plan. 

  • 10:1-4
For whom is Paul praying for?
    The Jews; his kin because they are still lost. 

And to whom is he praying to?
    God. 

And what is the origin of Paul’s prayer?
    His heart and its desire. 

And what is the goal of his heart’s prayer?
    “that they may be saved.” 

Can we say the same as Paul? That we pray from the heart? Or is prayer a chore to us?
    I often find it easy to pray for myself; only concerning my blessings. But even the Lord taught us otherwise; for, “hallowed be your name, your Kingdom come” comes before “give us our daily bread.” 

So how do we pray from the heart for others? 
    Obviously, we love them from the heart and therefore pray for them. 

But how do I grow to love someone? 
    Perhaps it\’s a closed circuit; we love them and therefore pray for them. Or we pray for them and therefore love them.
    The more you love; the more you pray. The more you pray; the more you love. 

What are some other ways we grow to love someone? 
    Knowing the love of God toward you,
    Denying yourself
    Recognizing their current spiritual state; under wrath or mercy. 

You’ll notice where this text is located; immediately after the teaching of the doctrine of election, predestination, and sovereign grace. The application is obvious; sovereign election leads us to pray for the lost. 

The question now is; does election lead us to pray for the lost? 
    Knowing that God is sovereign leads us to trust in Him for our salvation and those around us as well according to His plan of salvation. As our view of God increases so does our prayer life. 

  • 10:2
Paul, here, states that the Jews were zealous for God not according to personal intimacy, or knowledge as he puts it. 
In 10:3 he tells us why and how they were zealous.

  • 10:3
Paul tells us 3 things that the Jews did that caused them to not believe; what are those things? 
  1. Ignorant of the righteousness of God
  2. Sought to establish their own righteousness 
  3. Unsubmissive too God’s righteousness. 
    So clearly righteousness has a lot to do with this verse. What is the righteousness that Paul is talking about here?
    The righteousness given to us by God in Christ. 

So these are the things that those outside of Christ are doing. 
Given this verse, what would you say are the things we, those in Christ, should be doing?
  1. Knowing, personally, the righteousness of God
  2. Seeking the previously established righteousness of God
  3. Submit to God’s righteousness. 
    We know, we seek, we submit to Christ. 

  • 10:4
One interpretation is that Christ is the goal/purpose of the law; another is that for believers, Christ terminates any pursuit of the law in order to establish their own righteousness by it. These two views are not mutually exclusive and together make a good sense of Paul’s argument. 

10:5-13

  • 10:5
What must one do to have life?
    Obey the commandments of God. As we know from previous studies, no one was fully able to keep all the commands of God and thus none truly life, or righteousness, according to the law. 
    Paul in chapter 9 focused on God’s sovereignty in salvation, here in chapter 10 he focuses on man’s responsibility to the gospel. 
    Paul starts his gospel presentation to the Jew, like any good gospel presentation, by showing the condemnation of man. 

  • 10:6-7
Here, Paul moves to showing the accessibility of Christ to all. 

    These are a confusing set of verses that I’m not 100% able to understand. 
    However, here is what we are to get out of them, 
    “Paul quoted Moses on both sides of the issue. In Lv 18:5 obedience to the law brings life, no one can keep the law and gain righteousness (Paul implied 10:6). Faith-based righteousness is from Christ. He is accessible. He died for us and was raised from the dead. Moses pointed out that God’s revelation was accessible and Paul quoted his words to show that Christ is accessible.” (CSB Study Note, 10:5-7). 

  • 10:8
What is this “word of faith” that’s proclaimed?
    Given 10:17 I think the \”word of faith\” and the \”word of Christ\” are the same thing; we proclaim faith in Christ. 

  • 10:9
What is necessary for justification?
    Belief and confession in the Lord Jesus.

What does it mean to believe?
    Believe: Too personally know and submit to the word/revelation of God. 

What does it mean to confess?
    Confess: Too personally know and submit and actively live the word/revelation of God. 

What comes first confession or belief?
    The belief of heart then the action of the body; for the mouth speaks what the heart is full of. How can someone speak of that which they do not know or possess? 

What does this verse call us to believe in?
    “that God raised Him from the dead” the resurrection of Christ by God. 

And what’s so important about the resurrection that that is what we are called to believe in?
    Perhaps because the Gospel is wrapped up in the resurrection of Christ by God; there we see the completion of Christ’s work, the vindication of Christ by God, and the power of God toward those who believe. 

What are we called on to confess?
    “Jesus is Lord”. 

Which means what?
    “Lord”= Supreme sovereign overall; including over Caesar. This phrase, this outward living, put a lot of Christians to death. Thus, living this faith is no small, trivial thing; it is still a life and death matter. While their struggle was physical ours is spiritual; if we fail to live this faith we face spiritual death; but if we continue to live it we have true eternal life. 

    “confess with your mouth” and “believe in your heart” That is external and the internal. This faith is internal that always results in external action; this faith cannot remain hidden; even in the face of death for “what shall separate us from the love of Christ?” (Romans 8:35).

  • 10:11
What does it mean to believe with the heart?
    To believe with all of you and to believe sincerely. 

And why will no believer but put to shame?
    Our belief will not disappoint us; we have a secure hope in God. 

  • 10:12
What are these “riches” that are bestowed upon us?
    According to 10:13 Salvation from God; in 10:12 I think one of those rich is family/brotherhood/the Church, as well as the continual receiving of us into the Father’s arms (with the “calling” part in 10:12). 
    So in our belief, we gain salvation from God, adoption into the family of God, and acceptance of God.

  • 10:13
What does it mean to call on “the name of the Lord”? 
    To call, to plea, for the Lord and all that He is; IE all of His attributes.  

Why will those who call upon the Lord be saved?
    Because God is just and will keep His word. “All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out.” (John 6:37). 
    Moreover, it is the Lord who causes the call in us; it is only through His renewal of our hearts/wills that we call on Him. If we call on Him then He is already at work within us and we have already been made alive through Him. 

10:14-21

  • 10:14-15
    If Romans 8:29 was the divine order of salvation then here we have, what we could call, the human order of salvation. Paul here gives an analysis of what it involves when anyone calls on the name of the Lord to be saved. 

“How then will they call on Him in whom they have not believed?” 
What’s needed to call upon the Lord? 
    Belief. And the Lord causes our belief in Him. 

So what are the links in our silver chain of belief here?
    Sending (10:15), Proclaiming/Preaching (10:15), Hearing (10:14), Believing (10:14), Calling (10:14).

Who’s power does this silver chain rely on? 
    God’s. 
    His power is clearly seen in all of these 5 parts; He sends us, His word has its own power to get into the ear and into the heart to renew it for belief and then calling. 

If you had someone right in front of you right now and you could give them the gospel; what would you say?
    [Let them answer, follow up as needed]

And what makes the preacher\’s feet beautiful?
    The content of the message and the joy/love of the messenger. 

  • 10:16
    In the forthcoming verses, Paul will show us that the condition described in our “silver chain” had been met for Israel. 
    The gospel message was proclaimed throughout the Roman Empire. 
    The Jews heard but did not believe. The Gentiles heard too, and many embraced it. 
    Paul’s citations show that the Gentile conversion was predicted in the OT. 

How does one “obey the Gospel”?
    The good news is not only a gracious offer but a command to believe and repent. 

    And Paul quotes Isa. 53:1 where Isaiah is describing the substitutionary death of Christ; which is the good news of the gospel. 

  • 10:17
What is “the word of Christ”?
    It is the word, message, about Christ and from Christ. 
    Christ is the central focus of the Gospel and through the power of His word comes faith. 

  • 10:18
    Paul cited this quotation from the LXX of Ps. 19:4 to show that even David understood that God’s revelation of Himself has reached the whole earth. Paul does this to answer any detractors who would claim that the Jews did not hear and thus obey; even David knew this was false. 

  • 10:19
What say you, did Israel understand the gospel?
    No. They heard but did not believe. Israel was ignorant of the salvation truth contained in her own Scriptures, including that the Gospel would reach the Gentiles as Paul proves here in quoting Deut. 32:21 and Isaiah 65:1-2.

  • 10:21
    As throughout her history, Israel once again had contradicted the word of God-this time it was the truth of the Gospel. 

According to this verse, how long had God been patient with Israel?
    All-day long; God has been dealing with and patient with these people for a long time. 

Still according to this verse what did God do while dealing with these disobedient people?
    Held out His hand. He continually served them. 
    Likewise with us, when we continually deal with a brother, wayward or hard to love regardless, we continue to serve them in the hope that they will come back to, or continue to mature in the faith that was brought with the price of Christ’s death. 

Keep all this in mind for next week as we’ll look at God’s future plan for Israel.  

Theology in Hymns: Useful or Not?

Hymns help to teach the tenets of the faith and remember them.

– Words of sound doctrine mixed them with a memorable tune to result in lessons that can be easily learned/remembered. 
– Theology: Study of God
– Theology is the foundation of all your thinking; it sets the inclinations of the heart/mind.

Questions to consider:
  1. What theology is expressed in the congregational\’s singing?
  2. Is there sufficient pastoral breadth in music? 
  3. Is there sufficient liturgical breadth?
  4. Is there sufficient historical, cultural breadth?
  5. Does the music serve the text?
  6. Does the music encourage corporate worship?
  7. Is the music appropriate to the capability of the congregation?
  8. Do the hymns we sing encourage growth in discipleship?

Romans 7

So chapter 6 Paul proved that our sanctification is by faith in Christ alone and have been brought under a new law.

Chapter 7 Paul will show us the motivation for seeking Christ in daily Christian living.

7:1-6

  • 7:1-3
    Basically what Paul speaks of here is that According to law, a woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive. If during his lifetime she has a sexual relationship w/another man, the Law of marriage condemns her as an adulteress, broken the law. But if her husband dies she is no longer bound by the Law of marriage, free to marry another.
    Paul explains his analogy in 7:4.

  • 7:4
Explain to me how we \”died to the law through the body of Christ”.
    We died to the law through Christ, and particularly in His sacrificial death, because as the substitute for sinners He suffered the penalty of death that the law demanded. IE The law brings about our sin, Christ took my sin by His death and thus paying the penalty of the law for me. 

“belong to another” And who is this “other” that we belong to now?
    Christ. 

What are some implications for us belonging to Christ? 
    Because we are in Christ/belong to Him we are not condemned, we’re loved, accepted, adopted, we have purpose, new/resurrected life, we have a devotion to Him. 

    Paul is saying here that just as the widow in the analogy was freed to remarry, the believer has been freed from his hostile relationship to a law that condemned him, and can, therefore, be remarried-this time to Christ. 

And for what reason have you been released from the law and joined to Christ?
    “in order that we may bear fruit for God” 

What does a fruitful Christian life look like exactly?
    Simply put it is a daily walk with the constant inward and outward obedience to God’s word out of a heart overflowing with love/gratitude for God. This is chiefly shown in our actions and attitudes. 
    You were saved to live a purposeful life for God. 

  • 7:5
How were our “sinful passions” produced from the law?
    We wanted ways to rebel against God, the law showed us how. 
    Kind of like in Elementary and all the computer monitors had the “Don’t touch the monitor screen”; and of course what did we do? We touched the screen only because we desired to rebel against the rule (or law, as it were). 

    Also, do take note of whom Paul speaks, “for while we were living in the flesh”. The “in the flesh” Paul speaks of is the antonym for “in Christ”. IE they are both opposites of one another; for if one is “in Christ” they cannot be in the flesh. 
    Per example, I cannot be at my house and at Fairmount at the same time; I am in one or the other. And being in one of them I receive the natural consequences of being in one of them; at home, I receive the greatest benefit of all; my dog. and at Fairmount, I get you guys. 
    I can’t be in both at the same time; thus I can’t have the benefits of both at the same time. 

  • 7:6
So having been freed from the law I can now do whatever I want right?
    No; you are freed from the law/freed from the spiritual liabilities and penalties of God’s law. 
    Because we died in Christ when He died the law with it condemnation and penalties no longer have jurisdiction over us.         Moreover, you are freed from the law to be a servant of Christ; you are released from the harsh taskmaster into the loving Lord’s dominance. 

“new way of the Spirit” vs “old way fo the written code” What is Paul contrasting here?
    Our new life and old life.

And what would some core differences be old life and new life?
    The new way of the Spirit is a new state of mind which the Spirit produces, characterized by a new desire and ability to keep the commandments of God. 
    The old way is the external, written law/code that produced only hostility and condemnation. The new way relates to God lovingly the old way related to God hatefully. 

7:7-25

7:7
    I’ll illustrate Paul’s point here for us:
    So a murderous criminal is caught red-handed, and he’s brought before the judge and the judge reviews the evidence and determines that this man has broken the law and taken a life and condemns the murder.

Now, in this illustration would we say the law or the judge is evil?
    No. Because the judge and the law both did what was right and just. Just because the law resulted in a conviction it is by no means bad/unjust but in fact, it is quite the opposite. Likewise, God’s law is good, righteous and holy.

What does Paul say the law reveals to us?
    Sin. 

And what is sin?
    Transgression of God’s law, or to put it another way, sin is falling short of the glory of God. 
    Thus, the law reveals sin and in doing so reveals God’s divine/holy standard. IE we would not have known that “covetous” was against God had the law not said, “Do not covet”. 

7:8
    The word “opportunity” describes a base of operations for an expedition. Sin uses the specific requirements of the law as a base of operations from which to launch its evil work. Confronted by God’s law, the sinner’s rebellious nature finds the forbidden thing more attractive, not because it is inherently attractive, but because it furnishes an opportunity to assert one’s own self-will. 

    “sin lies dead” Not lifeless, but dormant. When the law comes, sin becomes fully active and overwhelms the sinner.

7:9
    “sin came alive” Paul realized his true condition as a desperate sinner.
    “I died” He realized his spiritual deadness, and that all his religious credentials and accomplishments were rubbish.

7:11
How is sin deceitful?
    In the same way, the serpent was deceitful, it promises life but brings death. 
    Here, Paul is saying that the Law, and his keeping thereof, convinced him to trust in Himself rather than God and the law was trying to teach him; in trusting in himself he found no life in God but separation from God/death. 

7:12
    IE much like our criminal illustration a moment ago; just because the law reveals, brings about, and condemns sin, bringing death to the sinner that does not mean that the law is evil. Rather the law is a perfect reflection of God’s holy character and the standard for believers to please Him. 

7:13
    This next portion of Romans is the second most conversational passage Romans (the first being Romans 9); mainly because to so it is unclear whether Paul speaks of his pre-conversation struggle with God or his post-conversation struggle with sin. 
    So, I’ll ask y’all: what are your thoughts? In 7:13-25, is Paul speaking of his coming to faith or struggle with sin?

    Given 7:22 I submit to you that Paul is speaking of his struggle with sin. This view also is most reasonable when one considers the content of the chapter; IE the believer’s relation to the law and sin. 

Considering our conversation on the law let me ask this question: 
How is a sinner brought to Christ? 
    Through the Spirit of course; but more specifically the Spirit works in a two-pronged manner: 
  1. The Spirit convicts the sinner of their sin under God’s law; showing the sinner that they have sinned and fallen short of God’s glory 
  2. The Spirits drawing of the sinner toward Christ; one could say that the Spirit renews the will and causes the sinner to desire Christ. 
    This is a summary of the Spirits ministry in the life of the regenerate/converted sinner. The Spirit drives the sinner and draws the sinner to Christ. 

    In 7:13 Paul shows us this by telling us that sin is the cause of spiritual death, not the law. The law is a tool that brings one to an awareness of their sin once convicted of their sin the law also serves to show the sinner a savior. 

7:14
    Paul continues to describe the believer and our struggle with sin.
    Paul says that he desires to obey God hates his sin (7:15, 19, 21); 
    he is humble recognizing that nothing good dwells in his humanness (7:18);
    he sees sin in himself, but not as all that is there (7:17, 20-22); 
    and he serves Christ with his mind (7:25). 
    Paul has already established that none of these attitudes ever describe the unsaved in Romans 3. 
    
    Moreover, given that Paul speaks in the present tense I also submit to you that he speaks of himself, obviously, but because of his great insight and that he is also in Christ, as we are, his struggle is our struggle and thus, his solution also applies to us. 

“of the flesh” is that the same thing as “in the flesh”?
    No. 
    Paul is speaking of his mortal humanness; he doesn’t say he is still “in the flesh” but rather the flesh is in him. 

7:15
    “understand” literally I don’t approve of my own actions. I do what I hate and that which I don\’t want to do. 

7:16
    And here, Paul is wishing to excite his new desire; to live according to his own nature. 

Would y\’all say you “want” a Christian life? Or that your “desire” God?
    I think this is one of the best signs that one is indeed saved. A natural man does not “hunger and thirst for righteousness”.

7:17
    “no longer I who do it” Basically, Paul here speaks of his new “I”. The Greek adverb for “no longer” signifies a complete and permanent change. Paul’s new inner self no longer approved of the sin that was still residing in his flesh, like the old self did. 

7:18
    “nothing good dwells in me” The flesh serves as a beachhead from which sin operates in the Christian’s life; it is still contaminated, the not-yet redeemed portion of us. 

7:22
    “I delight in the law of God” the believer’s justified, new inner self no longer sides with sin, but joyfully agrees with the law of God against sin.

    “delight” aka ‘joy’ I know we talked last week about being joyful in God; did y’all find this past week joyous? Why or why not?
[Let them answer. Follow up as needed].

7:23 
    “another law” or, to reference last week, another wolf. Both these laws go against each other-waging war against Paul’s desire to obey God’s law. 

7:24
“wretched man” We don’t talk like this anymore do we?
    No. Because we don’t think like this anymore. 
    The song doesn’t say, “Amazing grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a (self-esteemed) worthy-fella like me.” 

Why do y’all think we don’t talk like that anymore?
    We have a too low view of God and a too high view of ourselves. 
    This part of the purpose of the law for us now; to see the high, holy standard of God and the lowliness of man. 
    The law, in this way, also makes the Gospel that much sweeter to our souls. 
    If man is so far separated from God and God so far separated from man then the law underscores just how much God did for us in Christ and just how awful we should be in response to God’s work. 

    “deliver” the Greek word here is used to refer to a soldier pulling his wounded comrade from the battlefield. Literally, to rescue from danger.
    No doubt, Paul chooses his words carefully here to remind us of Christ and how He, in a way, rescued us from the battlefield.
And I’m also sure Paul chooses his words wisely as well as the rest of Romans as well; wouldn’t you all agree?

You will also notice this: 
What direction does Paul look toward for his deliverance? Inward or outward?
    Outward, “Who will deliver me…”.

7:25
And who is this great deliver?
    Christ. 

And what Paul’s reaction to the deliverance brought to us by Christ?
    “Thanks…” 
    We have seen several statements of Apostolic Abhorrence in Romans; but here I believe we see, what I’ll call, the Apostolic Adoration. 
    Christ delivers and is delivering Paul from his sin and Paul adores/love/worships Christ for it. 

Y’all are smart; tell me what\’s the application is for that last part.
    Simple, Christ delivers us from our sin, sin is death, Christ delivers us from death into life and we live in gratitude of that. 

    You’ll notice as you grow in your Christian walk that the more holy you become, the more sin you’ll see in your life. 
    Which means, all the more opportunities to be delivered, which only increases our gratitude/adoration to the Deliverer. This is why God does imitate justification but not imitate sanctification; God is increasingly honored by continually aiding/delivering us from our sin. 

“my mind” how exactly do we serve God in our minds?
    Jonathan Edwards said, “The will is the mind exercising its choice according to its strongest desire at that moment” 
That is to say, the regenerate mind choices to love God, choices to submit to Him, to kill the sin in us daily. 

Summary: 


    Paul teaches that though we still have sin in us we are to still activity submit to God out of gratitude for Christ and His delivery for us; we do this out of love, adoration, gratitude and not out of self-reliant pride.

Romans 6

Paul having proven the doctrine of justification now moves to discussing the doctrine of sanctification, which is the natural fruit of justification where God produces actual righteousness in the believer. 

6:1-14
  • 6:1
Through verse 1-10 Paul will begin his lesson on sanctification by arguing that in spite of their past, all whom God has justified will experience personal holiness. 

This said, I know none of us here had quite the life of Saul of Tarsus. But do y’all ever wrestle with past sin or guilt over your past life in your Christian walk?
    [Let them answer]
If so, how have you dealt with that guilt?
    Paul, throughout the rest of this chapter, will expound on the great change that has happened within you; that great changed happened through out union with Christ. Our union with Christ is the alms for a guilt stricken mind and a sinful heart. 

“Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?” 
So does preaching a justification based solely on the free grace of God encourage people to sin?
    This is what we’ll call the Apostolic abhorrence; Paul was horrified that such an abuse of God’s grace could even be conceived. One cannot receive this grace and not be changed by it; it is an effectual grace. 

  • 6:2
“sin still live in it?” 
How does one live in sin according to Paul’s reasoning exactly?
    “living in sin”, unlike the common expression of old to describe 2 co-habittating individuals in a relationship, would mean that we have our life, delight, fulfillment in our sin. 

    And Paul is about to cover how and what it means that we died to sin.

  • 6:3
So who is the “all of us” that were baptized into Christ?
    Christians. 

And what is baptism?
    Baptism, to the believer, is to show the transformation of the justification that God has worked in us. As Paul will elaborate more for us in 6:4

  • 6:4
So what does our baptism do for us?
   “we were buried therefore with Him” It shows our union with Christ.

For what reason was Christ buried?
    To be raised by the glory of the Father. 
    The attentive reader will note that this is Paul’s first use of the word “Father”. 

So last week we defined “glory” and “God”; here, let’s define “Father”.
    The Fatherhood of God is God making me His son/daughter and then basing all that I do on His work in me and not my work toward Him. 
    God as Father shows us that it is 
    1) a loving/caring relationship 
    2) it’s a relationship that can never be lost 
    3) it is also a familiar/close relation to us; Him close to us and us to Him 
    4) its a condescending relationship (IE God literally ooh goo gaa gaa’s His love to us). 

“walk in newness of life” 
What this “newness of life”?
    A resurrected life. The Father raised Christ up for His glory; He likewise makes us His child by raising us up for His glory as well; and we now live a resurrected/new life by Him, from Him and for Him. 

  • 6:5
    If you want a 100% biblical definition of baptism you need look no further than this verse. 
    We have already labored the point and purpose of baptism here and in other studies; I wouldn’t do so again here. 

6:6
Define “our old self”.
    The believer’s unregenerate self/our past sinful state. 
    Our sinful state was imputed to Christ when He took on the wrath of God; IE Christ gets our sin and we get His righteousness. 

“body of sin” essentially synonymous with “our old self”. Paul is not saying that the body is evil; he merely uses the terms “body” and “flesh” to refer to sinful propensities that are intertwined with physical weaknesses and pleasures. 

Why do y’all think Paul describes our past self/unregenerate state as being \”enslaved to sin”?
    Basically, because that’s what it was; it was our master and we had no freedom with it; our sinful passions said ‘jump\’ and we said ‘how high?’

  • 6:8 
How exactly does Christ’s death bring me life? 
    Simply put, sin leads me further away from God; while Christ and His work lead me closer to God. The closer to God I am the more life Ill possess. 

  • 6:9
Answer me this: How dead was Christ?
    Completely
And how alive is Christ right now?
    Completely.
Is He ever to die again?
    No; He is alive forevermore. 
And we died with Christ right? Our old sinful nature is done away with?
    Yes and yes. 
So does sin actually have any power over me? 
    No. 
    I go through all of that to labor the point of this text. 
How many of y’all have heard to “2 wolves” illustration?
    [Let them answer]
    
    Perhaps you’ve heard the “2 wolves” illustration: 
    Now that you’re saved there are now 2 wolves inside you; one of Spirit, one of flesh, and whether which one wins is dependent on which one you chose to feed, and make the most strong. 
    When Paul says that “died to sin” he means it; Christ’s death was a one-time event; likewise our death was as well.             Because we are “in Christ” and He died into our place we are counted dead with Him. 
    While the “2 wolves” illustration maybe what happens in the midst of temptation (and is in that case an accurate illustration) it is not accurate in regards to your new nature now. 
    
    A more accurate illustration of your life now would as follows: 
    Imagine a ransomed slave from an abusive master; your redeemer is now your master and you work for Him (sense He brought your life), but every now and again you hear your former master calling and barking orders at you. 
    You have no reason or duty to listen and obey your former master, because you are now totally free, but you sometimes do anyway out of reflex/old habit. 

    You have been redeemed by Christ to serve Him with the reward of eternal life. You will occasionally fall back into your old ways; but you can never be un-ransomed; you are forever changed.

  • 6:10-11
Now, let’s talk about how we actually spiritually live and die to sin.

Mason jar:
    Imagine if you will a mason jar full of rocks, of varies sizes, and I want to fill the jar completely with water. 
What must I first do? 
    Empty out all the rocks from the jar.
Is that enough have I accomplished the task I set out to do?
    No
What else must I do?
    Fill, the now empty jar, completely with water. 

    In a likewise manner we also must continually remove our sin from our lives and have more and more living water poured into us. 

Now, all that we’ve sufficiently covered what the process of repentance looks like; let’s actually cover the “how” to repentance. 

How do I remove sin in my life? Or rather, by what power do I remove my sin? IE Do I just try really really really hard not to sin or is it something more?
    Our sanctification, just like our justification, is by faith; not works. 

  • 6:11
Look at 6:11.
    Basically Paul is telling us to embrace the reality of our life in Christ by counting, or living, the reality of our faith. 
    If Christ died and raised and you’re in Christ then you died and raised as well; you are just as dead to sin and live with God as Christ is right now. 
    Paul is telling us to live in accordance with our faith. 
    We are made righteous with God by faith, not works. 
    Likewise we are made like Christ by faith as well. 
    We trust in God for our salvation AND sanctification. 


All that said, all that we just covered about repentance, fullness, faith, justification, sanctification I ask this question: 
Are we living this way? Are we living the way Paul is telling us to live? Thumbs, down, sideways (and don’t lie to me). 

Put your hand a bit higher for me if you answer is directly related to your homework assignment; if your result is directly related to your chief struggle this week.

Keep you struggle and result in mind while I ask these questions:
What is one thing you can do today to have joy in God?
    [Let them answer. Discuss. Follow up as needed.]
What is one thing we can do to help you in your walk with God?
     [Let them answer. Discuss. Follow up as needed.]
And out of personal curiosity: Is there any way I can serve you this week? 
    [Write down these answers]

And now we’re gonna put all of this together:
What is the single greatest thing I, and you, can do to love your Christian kinsman?
    Simply, to be Christ like. 
    Or, to put it another way, to have true personal holiness in private and public. 
    To quote one great man, “a good tree will bear good fruit. A bad tree = bad fruit” 
    We must be good trees in order to yield useful/beneficial fruit to help/love our kinsman. 

6:12-14
Paul addresses the conclusion of his readers: If the old self is dead, why is there continually a struggle with sin and how can the new self be brought about. 

  • 6:12
How does sin overcome you?
    You let it; you listen to the old master and obey its passions.
        We become passive in our walk, rather than active as we should be in our walk. 

6:15-23

  • 6:15
And here we see the second Apostolic abhorrence. 

  • 6:17
How do we become obedient from the heart?
    We obey sincerely; we obey out of love not out of mere desire to escape hellfire. 

  • 6:19
Does any amount of sin lead to any real happiness?
    No.
Does more sin lead to any real happiness?
    Also no. 
Paul here is laboring the point of sin’s unsatisfactory nature; you will never have happiness in vain sin; why bother searching for it?

  • 6:22
What does Paul claim as the fruit for our justification?
    Sanctification; the outcome of which is life eternal. 
    No justification, no sanctification, no eternal life. 
    If you are you justified, you will be sanctified, and you will be glorified. 

I was thinking about perseverance of the saints this week; particularly I was pondering what is the horizontal application of that doctrine; and I thought of this that I wanted to float by y’all: 

PotS: God brought us; God’s gonna keep us. 
I think one of the applications of that doctrine is patience with each other. 

Per example: So Ed is my brother, meaning, God brought him, God’s gonna keep him. God also brought me, He’s gonna keep me. Here’s the problem: Ed gets on my nerves, like all the time; he’s constantly swearing, constantly pushing the limits of grace. And God’s still gonna keep him. So we both have to grow in sanctification together; he has to put away his sin and I have to grow in love/grace/patience toward him. So we both grow in grace; and God still gets the glory. 

6:23
Why do y’all think this is such a popular verse?
    It\’s a great summary of Romans 6.

What are the 2 truths Paul is describing here?
  1. Spiritual death is the paycheck for every man’s slavery to sin. 
  2. Eternal life is a free gift God gives to undeserving sinners who believe in His Son.
We can have true enjoy and true life but we must take hold of it by faith in Christ and not trust in our own works. 

Big summary of today’s lesson: 

Paul teaches us to believe on all that Christ is for us; not just for salvation but also sanctification because of His great goodness and love to us.  

Romans 5

Two weeks ago Paul confidently proved that we are justified/made right with God through faith in the Christ. Now Paul will show us the fruits of this justification.

5:1-5
  • 5:1
What is the fruit of our justification that Paul mentions here?
    “peace with God” 

Is this “peace” internal or external”?
    It’s an external peace with God that leads to an internal peace; but Paul, here, chiefly speaks of external peace. 

Given this, what was the relationship between God and sinful man prior to his salvation?
    Man was in rebellion against God, but, moreover, God was a war with us. As Paul states in Ephesians we are “by nature children of wrath” (Eph 2).  
    It is not only important for us to understand our relationship with God now, after our justification, but also before all justification; God has us dead to rights, justly condemned under His holy righteousness, unable to save ourselves from His perfect wrath against our nature; and yet He still showed love to us. 
    He first loved, He moved first and completely to save us. Had it not been for God’s work, and His work in our lives we’d still yet be His enemy and He would still be ours. 

I said that this peace is external that leads to internal peace; do y’all agree with that? 
    [Let them answer]
How does it lead to internal peace?
    If our biggest problem in life is our war with God and Christ was the peace offering; thus ending the war, then our chief problem in life is solved by God alone; now, will He not continue to care for us now that we are His sons and daughters.

    Also, do take note of the confidence of Paul’s statement, “we have been justified by faith”; justify in the past tense, our salvation is totally accomplished and thus the fruits of that accomplishment are brought for us as well. 

  • 5:2
I don’t if it’s this way for y\’all; but sometimes I’ll read the word and it’ll be like a brink to me- no bread of life for my soul, no water of life, but others I feel utterly crushed under the weight of such truth and glory as this verse. And I hope in unpacking it some it becomes that for y\’all too. 

So same question once more, what are some of the fruits of our justification the Paul mentions here?
  1. Gained access to His grace
  2. We stand in grace
  3. We rejoice in the hope of God’s glory

So let\’s take these 3 gifts of God and try and see the weight of them. In order to properly understand any verse of the bible, we must remember the context. 

So remind me, to whom is Paul writing this letter?
    Both Jew and Gentile
What does it mean that we have access to His grace?
    We, mere mortals, in the midst of our sin, have God with us because of His unmerited kindness, or grace, toward us. 

What would the Jew’s reaction to such a statement have been given Jewish religion/rites etc?
    Awe, shock, gratitude, perhaps fear. 
    The Jew did not have such common access to God as we did; he had a high priest go to God once a year to cover, but not atone, for his sins under the Law. 
    I mention this because it underscores the weight of what Christ did for us in His life and death; we, in everyday life, have access to a holy, almighty God. 

Given this, let’s discuss ’standing in grace’. So what’s grace?
    Unmerited kindness/favor. 

Let me try and explain this “standing” in grace part to y\’all: 
So I got up to Mr. Ward and I say to him, “Hey buddy I’ve fallen behind on a loan payment, can you give me the money for it? Thanks.” 

So what’s Mr. Ward’s reaction to such a request? 
    He’ll deny it. 
Why?
    Because I have no right/privilege, to stand in his presence and make such a request. I am not His son. 

So why can I stand in the presence of God and make and even more bold/daring request to forgive my sin/to be granted mercy by a holy God?
    Because, by His grace, He has made me a son and thus He is my Father; it is a relationship that is founded and continued and grown by His grace, not my merit. 
    Thus, I go to Him on the basis of His grace toward me not my works toward Him. 

Third, “we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God”. Our translations could have said, “we glory in hope of the glory”; but rejoice is fine too. 

Let\’s define our terms first and foremost: 

Give me an example of you rejoicing in something?
    A fat check, a gift, a success/victory, a belly full of chickfila. 

What about those things causes delight/overflowing happiness?
    Simply, it\’s pleasing to you. It was good, beneficial, and it met a want or need of yours.

So thus far, we delight, or take pleasure \”in the hope\”…

What’s a biblical definition of hope?
    Faith, trust in God to fulfill all of His promises. 
    Or, trust in God to do all that He has said He will. 

“so we delight in the promises of the \”glory of God”. 
    So here we have “glory” and “God”.
    Let’s define our terms.

First, who is God?
    God is the sovereign, supreme, perfect being in all of existence.

How would y’all define the “glory\” of God? 
    The glory of God is God manifesting His perfect supremacy through all things, to everyone.
    Or, simply, the glory of God is God Himself. 

    Thus, we delight in the future promises of the supremely perfect (or perfectly supreme) being of all existence. 

    Do y\’all see why I was crushed under the weight of this verse now? You cannot only trust in the supreme being of existence but also delight in all that He is doing and will do. 

    I recommend you remember what we just did for your private devotions when you have trouble understanding a     text/passage. 
    What we just did was what you could call, “corporate mediation\” on God’s word, we read the verse, analysis, defined the terms/words in a way the was true to the bible and put it all back together again. 
    We looked at the engine, took it apart, understood each part of the engine and put it back together again; and now we can properly use it for our growth/benefit. 

  • 5:3
“Not only that…” So Paul’s about to add at more weight to the delight we have in the promises of the supreme Lord.

According to this verse, how do we have joy/rejoice in our suffering?
    We know/remember that our suffering makes us more enduring. 
    Suffering increases our endurance. 

Note that Paul assumes suffering. Why do we suffer? 
    Because the foreordained salvific plan of God is now but not yet.
    IE God is not done with humanity or the Church; He still has a plan/purpose for us here. 
    Once that purpose is completed and fully accomplished, once every soul that can be saved is saved then God will return to renew the Earth and all of Heaven will reside with us forever. 
    For now, we continue to labor the purposes of God by His strength till then. 
    I say this particular answer because of the word “hope”; chiefly hope in God’s promises-particularly His promise that He will renew all things and literally dwell with humanity once more. 
    The salvific plan of God is now, but not yet complete. 

    Thus, suffering puts muscle on your faith in God till that final day of complete redemption. We suffer because God, like any loving father, wants us to grow/mature. 

That said, what does it mean to grow as a Christian?
Too continually, and increasingly, submit to God even when you don’t feel like it. Or too continually rejoice in suffering and temptation. 

  • 5:5
“and hope does not put us to shame” or ‘hope doesn’t disappoint us”.
What is Paul’s reason for putting stock in trusting in God?
    God’s overflowing love toward those with the Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the aqueduct through with God gives His love to us. Given that this love is poured out to those with the Holy Spirit, I submit to you that this is a particular love of God toward His own people; it is a personal, eternal, overflowing love that God has for you because His Spirit dwells in you. 

Let me pick yall’s brain on this: 
   What is the relationship between suffering and sovereignty of God? IE is your suffering from God or merely allowed by God? 

    I ask this question here because, if we read this passage backward, God gave you His Spirit, through which He gives His particular love for you, out of that love you have hope in suffering all because of what Jesus accomplished for us in His life, death, and resurrection. 
    The Holy Spirit, love, hope, and justification are all particular toward you-sons and daughters of God-thus it seems rather unlikely that the suffering in your life is anything but general rather is seems reasonable to conclude that your suffering particular toward you as well. 
    Given that all of this-love, hope, the Spirit, your justification through Christ, were all foreordained I believe Paul is also showing that our suffering is also foreordained as well. 
    If this is indeed so then you have all the more reason to have trust and hope in the supreme being is not only sovereign over your salvation, in that He brought you and keeps you, but that your suffering is also from Him and therefore is a purposeful suffering meant to fill you more and more with His eternal love for you. 

5:6-11

  • 5:6 
For whom did Christ die?
    The ungodly, those that are without God. 
    It is for this reason that we must hammer home the wrath and condemnation of the heathen; they must see their godlessness/lostness before they can have God; if they keep their pride and believe in themselves to earn salvation then they shall never have it. 

“still weak” Meaning what?
    Weak as in unable-unable to save ourselves-rather than the opposite of strong. 

  • 5:7
    IE it\’s uncommon for such a sacrifice. Moreover, Paul points out that we are neither of those yet Christ still sacrificed Himself for us. 

  • 5:8
What was the motive for Christ’s death?
    To show the love of God, to express the glory of God. There was nothing in us that that motivated God to love us; He loved us because He is love. 
    And we also see that His love leads to salvation. 

  • 5:9 
So how are we justified? 
    According to this verse by His blood. 
    Turn to 4:25.

  • 4:25
I present the question once more, how are we justified?
    According to this verse, by His resurrection. 

Same question with two different answers. Is that a contradiction?
    No.
Why?
    Because we are justified by all the righteousness of Christ. He lived a perfect life, died a perfect death and was raised to perfection. All of Christ and all His life is His righteousness which is imputed, given, to us and that is our justification. 

  • 5:10
How are we saved by the living Christ?
    Christ lives to keep you or save you, from the wrath of God. He ensures your peace with God eternally. This is why the resurrection and ascension are so important; He lives eternally thus we do as well. 

“reconciled” What\’s that word mean?
    We were separated, or estranged, from God and He brought us back to Him; or we’re reconciled to Him. That’s the main theme of this chapter. 

5:12-17 Lecture then questions/discussion
Ok, how many of you could re-phrase Paul’s argument here?

    Basically, Paul sets out to show how one man’s death can provide salvation for many. To prove his point he uses Adam to establish the principle that it is possible for one man’s actions to affect many other people. 
    IE Paul uses Adam to show a  “negative imputation” to prove Christ’s \”positive imputation\”. 

    There are 2 main views on Original Sin; I will present both as we go because I think both works well. 
    1) Adam is man, he sinned, we are man, therefore, we inherit Adam’s sin
    2) Federal Headship where Adam was our Chief representative before God 

First off, who is “Adam”? 
    Adam our first parent; through whom the whole human race came from. 

What was Adam’s role in the Garden?
    I submit to you that Adam’s chief role in the Garden was Shepherd-High Priest. He was man’s first representative before God. 

Do y’all think Adam succeeded in his chief role?
    No.
Why?
    Because we listened and obeyed to the one who first brought sin into existence, that is Satan. So Satan through the deceiving of Adam brought sin into the human race. 

Now that the groundwork is laid out let me take us deeper into the essence of this passage.
Lecture:
    Sin entered the human race through Adam and humans became sinful by nature. Adam passed to all his descendants the inherent sinful nature he possessed because of his first disobedience. That nature is present from the moment of conception (Ps 51:5), making it impossible for man to live in a way that pleases God. 
    Satan, the father of sin (1 John 3:8) first brought temptation to Adam and Eve (Gen. 3). 
    Since his sin transformed his inner nature and brought spiritual death and depravity, that sinful nature would be passed on to all his children as well. And Adam, prior to his sin, was not subject to death, but through his sin, it became a grim certainty for him and his descendants. Death has 3 manifestations:
  1. spiritual death/separation from God
  2. physical death
  3. eternal death/second death
Moreover, because all humanity existed within Adam, and have through procreation inherited his fallenness and depravity, it can be said that all sinned in him. 
    Thus, humans are not sinners because we sin but rather they sin because they are sinners. 

  • 5:14
“yet death reigned” But even without the law, death was universal. All men, from Adam to Moses, were subject to death, not because of their sinful acts against the law (which they did not yet have) but because of their own inherited sinful nature. 

“sinning…not like…of Adam” those who had no specific revelation as did Adam or those with the law of Moses, but nevertheless sinned against the holiness of God, even without Law. 

“who was a type of the one to come” In what way was Adam a type of Christ?
     Both Adam and Christ were similar in that their acts affected many others. This phrase serves as a transition from the apostle’s discussion of the transition of Adam’s sin to the crediting of Christ’s righteousness. 
    Whereas Adam failed in his role of Shepherd-High Priest Christ fulfills all His salvific duties entirely.

  • 5:15
This passage Paul explores the contrasts between the condemning act of Adam and the redemptive act of Jesus Christ. They are different in effect (5:15) , extent (5:16), efficacy (5:17), essence (5:18-19), and energy (5:20-21). 

“many died” Paul uses the word “many” with 2 distinct menials in 5:15, just as he will the word “all” in 5:18. He has already established that all men bear the guilt of sin and are therefore subject to death. 
So the “many” who die must refer to all Adam’s descendants. 
“much more” Christ\’s one act of redemption was immeasurably greater than Adam’s one act of condemnation.

  • 5:16
What’s Paul mean when he says “the free gift”?
    Salvation by grace. 
“condemnation” the divine guilty verdict; the opposite of justification. 
“many trespasses” Adam brought upon all men the condemnation for only one offense of God’s law. Christ, however, delivers the believer from the condemnation of many offenses. 

  • 5:17
“death reigned” Adam’s sin brought universal death-exactly opposite the result he expected and Satan had promised: ‘you will be like God (Gen. 3:5). JC’s sacrifice brought salvation to those who believe. 
In what way do those in Christ “reign in life”? 
    Unlike Adam’s act, Christ’s act has and will accomplish exactly what He intended- that is spiritual life. 

5:18-21
    5:18-19 Paul summarizes the analogy of Adam and JC.

  • 5:18
“one act of righteousness” Not a reference to a single event but generally to Christ’s obedience culminating in the greatest demonstration of that obedience, death on a cross (Phil. 2:8). 
“justification…for all men” This cannot mean that all men will be saved; salvation is only for those who exercise faith in Christ. 
    Rather, like the word “many” in 5:15 Paul is using “all” with two different meaning for the sake of parallelism, a common practice of the OT.

  • 5:19
“made righteous” This expression probably refers to one’s legal status before God and not an actual change in character, since Paul is contrasting justification and condemnation throughout this passage, and he has not yet introduced the doctrine of sanctification which deals with the actual transformation of the sinner as a result of redemption. 

  • 5:20
“the law came in” How did the Law “increase” sin and trespass? 
     Although the Mosaic law is not flawed its presence caused man’s sin to increase. We are by nature rebels against God; and actually, seek out new ways to rebel against Him. The Law gave us a guideline to do just that. Thus it made meant more aware of their own sinfulness and inability to keep God’s perfect standard and it serves as a teacher to drive them to Christ.

  • 5:21
    The final summary of the analogy of Adam and JC. 
Look at the word “grace”. What does this grace of God lead to for us?
“righteousness that leads to eternal life”. God’s grace is a purposeful grace in your life with the intent and effect to bring you and keep you to eternal life. 

Thus, Paul proves the “negative imputation” of Adam and we, therefore, rejoice in the “positive (and perfect) imputation\” of Christ. Once more, Paul shows us our total sinful nature from Adam to exemplify just how much Christ has done for us; leading us to rejoice in Him even in suffering.  

These Things Are Impossible For God

Hebrews 6:4

For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. 7 For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God.

Hebrews 6:18

So when God desired to show more convincingly to the heirs of the promise the unchangeable character of his purpose, he guaranteed it with an oath, 18 so that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled for refuge might have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us. 19 We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain

Hebrews 10:4

For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.

Hebrews 11:6

And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.

Latin Pharses

\”a posteriori — from the latter; knowledge or justification is dependent on experience or empirical evidence
a priori — from what comes before; knowledge or justification is independent of experience
acta non verba — deeds, not words
ad hoc — to this — improvised or made up
ad hominem — to the man; below-the-belt personal attack rather than a reasoned argument
ad honorem — for honor
ad infinitum — to infinity
ad nauseam — used to describe an argument that has been taking place to the point of nausea
ad victoriam — to victory; more commonly translated into “for victory,” this was a battle cry of the Romans
alea iacta est — the die has been cast
alias — at another time; an assumed name or pseudonym
alibi — elsewhere
alma mater — nourishing mother; used to denote one’s college/university
amor patriae — love of one’s country
amor vincit omnia — love conquers all
annuit cœptis –He (God) nods at things being begun; or “he approves our undertakings,” motto on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States and on the back of the United States one-dollar bill
ante bellum — before the war; commonly used in the Southern United States as antebellum to refer to the period preceding the American Civil War
aqua vitae — water of life; used to refer to various native distilled beverages, such as whisky (uisge beatha) in Scotland and Ireland, gin in Holland, and brandy (eau de vie) in France
arte et marte — by skill and valour
astra inclinant, sed non obligant — the stars incline us, they do not bind us; refers to the strength of free will over astrological determinism
audemus jura nostra defendere — we dare to defend our rights; state motto of Alabama
audere est facere — to dare is to do
audio — I hear
aurea mediocritas — golden mean; refers to the ethical goal of reaching a virtuous middle ground between two sinful extremes
auribus teneo lupum — I hold a wolf by the ears; a common ancient proverb; indicates that one is in a dangerous situation where both holding on and letting go could be deadly; a modern version is, “to have a tiger by the tail”
aut cum scuto aut in scuto — either with shield or on shield; do or die, “no retreat”; said by Spartan mothers to their sons as they departed for battle
aut neca aut necare — either kill or be killed
aut viam inveniam aut faciam — I will either find a way or make one; said by Hannibal, the great ancient military commander
barba non facit philosophum — a beard doesn’t make one a philosopher
bellum omnium contra omnes — war of all against all
bis dat qui cito dat — he gives twice, who gives promptly; a gift given without hesitation is as good as two gifts
bona fide — good faith
bono malum superate — overcome evil with good
carpe diem — seize the day
caveat emptor — let the buyer beware; the purchaser is responsible for checking whether the goods suit his need
circa — around, or approximately
citius altius forties — faster, higher, stronger; modern Olympics motto
cogito ergo sum — “I think therefore I am”; famous quote by Rene Descartes
contemptus mundi/saeculi — scorn for the world/times; despising the secular world, the monk or philosopher’s rejection of a mundane life and worldly values
corpus christi — body of Christ
corruptissima re publica plurimae leges — when the republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous; said by Tacitus
creatio ex nihilo — creation out of nothing; a concept about creation, often used in a theological or philosophical context
cura te ipsum — take care of your own self; an exhortation to physicians, or experts in general, to deal with their own problems before addressing those of others
curriculum vitae — the course of one’s life; in business, a lengthened resume
de facto — from the fact; distinguishing what’s supposed to be from what is reality
deo volente — God willing
deus ex machina — God out of a machine; a term meaning a conflict is resolved in improbable or implausible ways
dictum factum — what is said is done
disce quasi semper victurus vive quasi cras moriturus — learn as if you’re always going to live; live as if tomorrow you’re going to die
discendo discimus — while teaching we learn
docendo disco, scribendo cogito — I learn by teaching, think by writing
ductus exemplo — leadership by example
ducunt volentem fata, nolentem trahunt — the fates lead the willing and drag the unwilling; attributed to Lucius Annaeus Seneca
dulce bellum inexpertis — war is sweet to the inexperienced
dulce et decorum est pro patria mori — it is sweet and fitting to die for your country
dulcius ex asperis — sweeter after difficulties
e pluribus unum — out of many, one; on the U.S. seal, and was once the country’s de facto motto
emeritus — veteran; retired from office
ergo — therefore
et alii — and others; abbreviated et al.
et cetera — and the others
ex animo — from the heart; thus, “sincerely”
ex libris — from the library of; to mark books from a library
ex nihilo — out of nothing
ex post facto — from a thing done afterward; said of law with retroactive effect
faber est suae quisque fortunae — every man is the artisan of his own fortune; quote by Appius Claudius Caecus
fac fortia et patere — do brave deeds and endure
flectere si nequeo superos, acheronta movebo — if I cannot move heaven I will raise hell; from Virgil’s Aeneid
fortes fortuna adiuvat — fortune favors the bold
fortis in arduis — strong in difficulties
gloria in excelsis Deo — glory to God in the highest
habeas corpus — you should have the body; a legal term from the 14th century or earlier; commonly used as the general term for a prisoner’s right to challenge the legality of their detention
habemus papam — we have a pope; used after a Catholic Church papal election to announce publicly a successful ballot to elect a new pope
historia vitae magistra — history, the teacher of life; from Cicero; also “history is the mistress of life”
hoc est bellum — this is war
homo unius libri (timeo) — (I fear) a man of one book; attributed to Thomas Aquinas
honor virtutis praemium — esteem is the reward of virtue
hostis humani generis — enemy of the human race; Cicero defined pirates in Roman law as being enemies of humanity in general
humilitas occidit superbiam — humility conquers pride
igne natura renovatur integra — through fire, nature is reborn whole
ignis aurum probat — fire tests gold; a phrase referring to the refining of character through difficult circumstances
in absentia — in the absence
in aqua sanitas — in water there is health
in flagrante delicto — in flaming crime; caught red-handed, or in the act
in memoriam — into the memory; more commonly “in memory of”
in omnia paratus — ready for anything
in situ — in position; something that exists in an original or natural state
in toto — in all or entirely
in umbra, igitur, pugnabimus — then we will fight in the shade; made famous by Spartans in the battle of Thermopylae and by the movie 300
in utero — in the womb
in vitro — in glass; biological process that occurs in the lab
incepto ne desistam — may I not shrink from my purpose
intelligenti pauca — few words suffice for he who understands
invicta — unconquered
invictus maneo — I remain unvanquished
ipso facto — by the fact itself; something is true by its very nature
labor omnia vincit — hard work conquers all
laborare pugnare parati sumus — to work, (or) to fight; we are ready
labore et honore — by labor and honor
leges sine moribus vanae — laws without morals [are] vain
lex parsimoniae — law of succinctness; also known as Occam’s Razor; the simplest explanation is usually the correct one
lex talionis — the law of retaliation
magna cum laude — with great praise
magna est vis consuetudinis — great is the power of habit
magnum opus — great work; said of someone’s masterpiece
mala fide — in bad faith; said of an act done with knowledge of its illegality, or with intention to defraud or mislead someone; opposite of bona fide
malum in se — wrong in itself; a legal term meaning that something is inherently wrong
malum prohibitum — wrong due to being prohibited; a legal term meaning that something is only wrong because it is against the law
mea culpa — my fault
meliora — better things; carrying the connotation of “always better”
memento mori — remember that [you will] die; was whispered by a servant into the ear of a victorious Roman general to check his pride as he paraded through cheering crowds after a victory; a genre of art meant to remind the viewer of the reality of his death
memento vivere — remember to live
memores acti prudentes future — mindful of what has been done, aware of what will be
modus operandi — method of operating; abbreviated M.O.
montani semper liberi — mountaineers [are] always free; state motto of West Virginia
morior invictus — death before defeat
morituri te salutant — those who are about to die salute you; popularized as a standard salute from gladiators to the emperor, but only recorded once in Roman history
morte magis metuenda senectus — old age should rather be feared than death
mulgere hircum — to milk a male goat; to attempt the impossible
multa paucis — say much in few words
nanos gigantum humeris insidentes — dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants; commonly known by the letters of Isaac Newton: “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants”
nec aspera terrent — they don’t terrify the rough ones; frightened by no difficulties; less literally “difficulties be damned”
nec temere nec timide — neither reckless nor timid
nolo contendere — I do not wish to contend; that is, “no contest”; a plea that can be entered on behalf of a defendant in a court that states that the accused doesn’t admit guilt, but will accept punishment for a crime
non ducor, duco — I am not led; I lead
non loqui sed facere — not talk but action
non progredi est regredi — to not go forward is to go backward
non scholae, sed vitae discimus — we learn not for school, but for life; from Seneca
non sequitur — it does not follow; in general, a comment which is absurd due to not making sense in its context (rather than due to being inherently nonsensical or internally inconsistent); often used in humor
non sum qualis eram — I am not such as I was; or “I am not the kind of person I once was”
nosce te ipsum — know thyself; from Cicero
novus ordo seclorum — new order of the ages; from Virgil; motto on the Great Seal of the United States
nulla tenaci invia est via — for the tenacious, no road is impassable
obliti privatorum, publica curate — forget private affairs, take care of public ones; Roman political saying which reminds that common good should be given priority over private matters for any person having a responsibility in the State
panem et circenses — bread and circuses; originally described all that was needed for emperors to placate the Roman mob; today used to describe any entertainment used to distract public attention from more important matters
para bellum — prepare for war; if you want peace, prepare for war; if a country is ready for war, its enemies are less likely to attack
parvis imbutus tentabis grandia tutus — when you are steeped in little things, you shall safely attempt great things; sometimes translated as, “once you have accomplished small things, you may attempt great ones safely”
pater familias — father of the family; the eldest male in a family
pecunia, si uti scis, ancilla est; si nescis, domina — if you know how to use money, money is your slave; if you don’t, money is your master
per angusta ad augusta — through difficulties to greatness
per annum — by the year
per capita — by the person
per diem — by the day
per se — through itself
persona non grata — person not pleasing; an unwelcome, unwanted or undesirable person
pollice verso — with a turned thumb; used by Roman crowds to pass judgment on a defeated gladiator
post mortem — after death
postscriptum — thing having been written afterward; in writing, abbreviated P.S.
praemonitus praemunitus — forewarned is forearmed
praesis ut prosis ne ut imperes — lead in order to serve, not in order to rule
primus inter pares — first among equals; a title of the Roman Emperors
pro bono — for the good; in business, refers to services rendered at no charge
pro rata — for the rate
quam bene vivas referre (or refert), non quam diu — it is how well you live that matters, not how long; from Seneca
qui totum vult totum perdit — he who wants everything loses everything; attributed to Seneca
quid pro quo — this for that; an exchange of value
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur — whatever has been said in Latin seems deep; or “anything said in Latin sounds profound”; a recent ironic Latin phrase to poke fun at people who seem to use Latin phrases and quotations only to make themselves sound more important or “educated”
quorum — of whom; the number of members whose presence is required under the rules to make any given meeting constitutional
requiescat in pace — let him rest in peace; abbreviated R.I.P.
rigor mortis — stiffness of death
scientia ac labore — knowledge through hard work
scientia ipsa potentia est — knowledge itself is power
semper anticus — always forward
semper fidelis — always faithful; U.S. Marines motto
semper fortis — always brave
semper paratus — always prepared
semper virilis — always virile
si vales, valeo — when you are strong, I am strong
si vis pacem, para bellum — if you want peace, prepare for war
sic parvis magna — greatness from small beginnings — motto of Sir Frances Drake
sic vita est — thus is life; the ancient version of “it is what it is”
sola fide — by faith alone
sola nobilitat virtus — virtue alone ennobles
solvitur ambulando  it is solved by walking
spes bona — good hope
statim (stat) — immediately; medical shorthand
status quo — the situation in which; current condition
subpoena — under penalty
sum quod eris — I am what you will be; a gravestone inscription to remind the reader of the inevitability of death
summa cum laude — with highest praise
summum bonum — the supreme good
suum cuique — to each his own
tabula rasa — scraped tablet; “blank slate”; John Locke used the term to describe the human mind at birth, before it had acquired any knowledge
tempora heroic — Heroic Age
tempus edax rerum — time, devourer of all things
tempus fugit — time flees; commonly mistranslated “time flies”
terra firma — firm ground
terra incognita — unknown land; used on old maps to show unexplored areas
vae victis — woe to the conquered
vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas — vanity of vanities; everything [is] vanity; from Ecclesiastes 1
veni vidi vici — I came, I saw, I conquered; famously said by Julius Caesar
verbatim — repeat exactly
veritas et aequitas — truth and equity
versus — against
veto — I forbid
vice versa — to change or turn around
vincit qui patitur — he conquers who endures
vincit qui se vincit — he conquers who conquers himself
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit — [a] wise man does not urinate [up] against the wind
virile agitur — the manly thing is being done
viriliter agite — act in a manly way
viriliter agite estote fortes — quit ye like men, be strong
virtus tentamine gaudet — strength rejoices in the challenge
virtute et armis — by virtue and arms; or “by manhood and weapons”; state motto of Mississippi
vive memor leti — live remembering death
vivere est vincere — to live is to conquer; Captain John Smith’s personal motto
vivere militare est — to live is to fight
vox populi — voice of the people\”




Biblia: Bible. Book. 
Biblia Sacra: Holy Bible. 
Vulgata: Vulgate (official Latin Bible). 
Vetus TestamentumOld Testament. 
Novum Testamentum: New Testament.
Sola Scriptura: Scripture Alone. This was the fundamental point in dispute in the Protestant Reformation. It is taught in 2 Tim. 3:16-17; I Cor.4:6; Acts 17:11; Isa.8:20, etc.
Analogia Scripturae: The Analogy of Scripture. This is explained in the formula: \”Scripturam ex Scriptura explicandam esse\”, or \”Scripture is to be explained by Scripture.\” Related to this principle is the principle of Analogia Fide, or \”Analogy of Faith.\” That is, Biblical doctrines are to be interpreted in relation to the basic message of the Bible, the Gospel, the content of faith, often called The Faith. Cf.1 Cor.2:13, 15:1-4.
Testimonium Internum Spiritu Sanctu: The Internal Testimony of the Holy Spirit. The Spirit who inspired Scripture also authenticates and proves its divine origin through the Scripture itself. This is especially emphasized by Calvinists. Cf.Heb.10:15; I John 5:7-8.
Deus: God. Corresponds to the Greek word THEOS. 
Deus est: God is. 
Deus Absconditus: The Hidden God. 
Deus Revelatus: The Revealed God. 
Verbum Dei: Word of God. 
Lux Dei: Light of God.
Vox Dei: Voice of God. 
Imago Dei: Image of God. The word \”deity\” comes from Deus.
Trinitas: Trinity. Probably coined by Tertullian by combining the Latin words for three and one. The word is not found in Scripture, but the doctrine is (Matt. 28:19).
Actus Purus: Pure Actuality. Refers to God as to His perfect self-existence. Creation is potential or derivative in being, or growing in being once created. God is perfect being.
Sensus Divinitas: The sense of divinity. All men know that God exists (Rom. 1:18-21). Thus, there are no real atheists. Especially emphasized by Calvinists, particularly those of the Presuppositionalist school of apologetics, such as Cornelius Van Til.
Theologica: Theology. Based on the Greek words for God and science. 
Summa Theologica: Sum of Theology. This was the title of the famous systematic theology by Thomas Aquinas.
Loci Communes: Common Places. This was the usual term for systematic theology by the Lutherans, such as the important one by Philip Melanchthon. It refers to the collection of Scripture texts according to subject. 
Locus Classicus: Classic Place. The major Bible text on a subject.
Institutio Christianae Religionis: Institutes of the Christian Religion. Calvin\’s main work.
Summum Bonum: Chief Good. God is the first cause of all, and the final goal. And so, the chief end for which all things were created is the glory of God.
Analogia Entis: Analogy of Being. The error that says that God and Man both share the same kind of being, differing in quantity but not in quality. Basically pantheistic.
Protoevangelium : The First Gospel. The first revelation of the Gospel was Gen. 3:15.
Foedus: Covenant. Federal Theology (or Federalism) is Covenant Theology.
Lex: Law. 
Lex Dei: Law of God. 
Lex Naturalis: Natural Law, revealed in Creation (Rom.1:18-23, 2:14-15). 
Lex Mosaica: Law of Moses. 
Lex Ceremonialis: Ceremonial Law. The temporary and symbolic laws of Moses, replaced by baptism and communion (Col. 2:16-17). 
Lex Moralis: Moral Law, God\’s fundamental, unchangeable Law, in force in both testaments. 
Lex Talionis: Law of Retribution (or retaliation). An eye for an eye, the punishment fits the crime, you reap what you sow. 
Lex Rex: Law and the King, or Law of the King. Title of important book by Samuel Rutherford on the use of Biblical civil law today.  
Creatio ex Nihilo: Creation out of nothing. God created merely by speaking it into existence.
Infralapsus: Infralapsarian. God first ordained the Fall and then elected men in the logical order of the eternal decrees. 
Supralapsus: Supralapsarian. God first elected some and rejected others before He ordained the Fall. 
Lapsus: Fall.
Ordo Salutis: Order of Salvation. Reformed theologians coined the term. 
Armilla Aurea, or Golden Chain, to relate the elements and stages of salvation according to Rom.8:29-30, etc.
Sola Gratia: Grace alone. Grace-faith-justification-works, not grace-faith-works-justification.
Sola Fide: Faith alone. 
Bona fide: Good faith. 
Credo: I believe. 
Notitia: Knowledge, the first element of saving faith. 
Assensus: Assent, the second element of faith. Fiducia: Trust, the third element of faith.
Simul lustus et Peccator: Simultaneously just and sinful. When we are justified, we are still sinful of ourselves. Even though our natures are changed in regeneration, there is still indwelling sin within us. The basis of our acceptance with God is not our changed nature, but rather the righteousness of Christ. His righteousness is thus Iustia Alienum, an alien righteousness – it is inherent in Christ, but not in us. In justification, God imputes or accounts this to us. It is then Iustia Imputata, imputed righteousness.
Articulus Stantis et Cadentis Ecclesiae: The article by which the Church stands and falls. Luther\’s statement concerning justification of the imputed righteousness of Christ by faith alone, rejected by Roman Catholicism.
Solo Christo: Christ alone. Not Christ and priests, pastors, parents, or anyone else.
Extra Calvinisticum: The Calvinistic Extra. The Lutherans believed in the ubiquity (omnipresence)  of Christ\’s human body and nature, whereas the Calvinists have believed the historic view that Christ\’s human body-and-soul is not infinite or omnipresent, but is only now at the right hand of the Father. Calvinists hold to the principle Finitum non Capax Infiniti, or the finite is not capable of the infinite (the finite human nature of Christ is not capable of containing His infinite divine nature in its entirety).Thus, ever since the Incarnation, there is still infinite deity beyond Christ\’s human nature. The beyond is \”extra\” or outside, infinite.
Corpus Christi: The Body of Christ. 
Hoc est Corpus Meum: This is My Body.
Sacramentum: Sacrament. Catholicism believes the sacraments are magical instruments which actually and physically confer grace. Their principle is Ex Opere Operato, or out of the work worked. Do something or receive a physical sacrament, and grace is automatically given. True Protestants, however, rightly reject this and take the word sacramentum to mean mystery, a symbolic ordinance in which grace is given through the Word of God.
Papa: Pope, father. Catholicism says he is infallible when he pronounces a truth as dogma when he speaks Ex Cathedra, from the chair (of Peter). This contradicts Sola Scriptura.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus: Outside the Church there is no salvation. The Catholic heresy that there is no salvation outside Catholicism. Protestants believe rather that salvation is not given through a Church but through Christ. There are true believers in many churches, but not outside Biblical Christianity or out of the Body of Christ.
Reformata sed Semper Reformanda: Reformed and always reforming. The Protestant principle that the Church should always be striving to conform to Scripture. So should Christians.
Posse non Peccare: Able not to sin. Adam\’s state before the Fall, and in another way also ours after we are saved. Non Posse non Peccare: Not able not to sin. Total inability to obey God or resist sinning. Unregenerate Man. Non Posse Peccare: Not able to sin. In one sense, God alone is unable to sin, being intrinsically holy. In another sense, the elect will be unable to sin when they are perfected in Heaven (Heb. 12:23; Eph. 1:4).
Soli Deo Gloria: To God alone be the glory. 
Gloria in Excelsis Deo: Glory to God in the highest.
Lectio Continua – the ancient practice of reading, studying, preaching through entire books of the Bible at a time in order to get a better understanding of a particular book. This method of study and preaching is for men, not cowards because it requires the student and preacher, respectively, to know each verse, paragraph and chapter of the book and that includes the \”tough texts\” that we have to deal with. This method will make for a more well-rounded student and preacher. 

Romans 4

Having sufficiently shown the condemnation of Jew and Gentile in chapters 1-3 and showing us the instrument of righteousness, that is faith, here in chapter 4 Paul primarily looks to Abraham, a major figure of the OT and patriarch to the faith, to prove that our right stating with God is by faith alone and not works or rituals. 

4:1-4
  • 4:1
So what do y’all know about Abraham? 
    Abraham was first known as Abram when he was called by God, at 75 years old, to leave home and go off to a faraway land that God promised to him. His full journey can be read in Genesis 12-25. 
    But for our purposes, we will only be focusing on 15-17. Chapter 15 is where God makes a covenant with Abram promising that he will have an heir and his heir be as numerous as the stars (Genesis 15:5) and Abram “believed the Lord, and he counted it to him as righteousness. 

Why, of all the great saints of the OT, does Paul chiefly point to Abraham as an example of Sola Fide/Faith alone?
    For starters, it says that Abram believed and was justified; so he is literally the best example for Paul to use. 
However, Paul also points us to Abraham because the Jews held him up as the supreme example of a righteous man (John 8:39); the Pharisees thought that they could be “good enough” for God used Abraham and his work, as well as the other patriarchs of the OT, to try and support their works-righteousness narrative. 

    All this to say, Paul uses Abraham as a tactical spiritual gut punch to the Jew to teach them that salvation is by faith in God alone and not by any wages or works. 

  • 4:2
    IE In the presence of God it is clearly seen that Abraham couldn’t do enough to gain anything from God.

  • 4:3
    Here, Paul quotes Genesis 15:6 one of the clearest statements in all of scripture about justification. 
“counted” also translated ‘imputed’; meaning to take something that belongs to someone and credit to another’s account. It’s a one-sided transaction – Abraham did nothing to accumulate; God simply credited His own righteousness to him. 

Why did God count Abraham as righteous? 
    Because Abraham believed. 

Why is belief means by which God intervenes/works in our lives?
    Belief is the means by which God works in our lives because belief is a full trust/reliance on God to do what He has promised. If one is still unbelieving then they are still relying on themselves and attempting to earn God’s blessing or their own salvation, and thus boasting in themselves and their own work and robbing God of His due glory. 

    Thus, Abraham believed, fully relied on God, to do as He said He would and God saw Him/counted Him as in right stating with Him. 

  • 4:4
We’ve talked a lot about this “gift of God’s grace” in our lives. 
Let’s analyze the other side of that coin; what can we earn from God? 
    In our natural state we are in unbelief and relying on ourselves; therefore robbing God of His glory. And God is not one to share His glory with another. Thus we can earn, or store up, His anger/wrath for ourselves when we do rely on ourselves and not give Him the honor He is due. 
    I mention this because that’s what Paul is meaning here. If God could be appeased by our works for our salvation then He is just, but not gracious or merciful or loving; and then, is no more than another sinful human like us.

4:5-8
  • 4:5
What is required for us to be righteous?
    Belief in Him who justifies the ungodly. 
The keen observer will see in this verse the restfulness of the believer and the working of God. “who justifies” it is God who makes us right with Him and we “[believe] in Him” that is we believe that it is He who is doing the work in us. We stop from out never-ending work in futility earning our right relationship with God and simply, comfortably rest in all that Christ has done for us; you need not do a thing for the good shepherd will not and never has lost one of His sheep, all who rest in Him rest comfortably and securely because it is *Him* who justifies. 

  • 4:6
So who’s David?
    David was a shepherd-King of Israel in the OT. In this way, he was a type/shadow of the Christ, the great shepherd-king who shepherds His people to rest and salvation in Him and reigns over them the blessing of being made like Him in sanctification.

In what way is salvation a “blessing” as David and Paul put it?
    For starters, we know God, we are forgiven by God, we have a true rest in Him, we delight in Him, we have a true lasting pleasure in Him. 

  • 4:7-8
Do y\’all know when David wrote this Psalm? 
    Paul is quoting Psalm 32:1-2 here. Along with Psalm 51, it is one of the confessional prayers of David after he slept with a married woman, Bethsheba, who bore David a son and conspired with his general to kill her husband who is also his best friend. David is a hope and example of the weak or backslid Christian; if anyone were more worthy of God’s wrath it would be David, BUT he received mercy none this less. (This story is in 2 Sam. 11-12). 

    This Psalm has been classified by the early church as one of the 7 penitential Psalms (Ps. 6, 32, 38, 51, 102, 130, 142)
Here, David teaches us the lesson of remembering the result of sin, confession, and forgiveness. 

Look at 7 and 8, how does David describe the “blessed” man in each verse?
    4:7 the blessed man is one who’s lawless deeds and sins are forgiven; almost like the due wrath and anger toward those sins are satisfied. IE propitiation.
    4:8 the blessed man is the one who the Lord will not count/see his sin against God; almost like that sin is wiped away. IE expiation. 

And how did David know this blessed forgiveness?
    Very simply, he was forgiven; he experienced this great blessing firsthand. 

So both Abraham and David were forgiven and righteous before God. How did this happen for them?
    Very simple as well. Belief is trusting absolutely on God. God promised that there would be a messiah to come to bring all of God’s people to right standing with Him. Both Abraham and David trusted God’s promise in this and were, like us, justified by Christ’s work that was finished on the cross. 
    IE Abraham and David looked forward to their justification and we look back to it. 

4:9-12
  • 4:9-10
Here, Paul is stating that Scripture says Abraham was justified prior to his fulfillment of rituals; thus he was justified by faith and not rituals/works. 

  • 4:11
Let me take the essence of what Paul says here and rephrase it: Why, if we are saved by faith in Christ alone do we need the sacraments: baptism, eucharist, marriage? 
    They, like circumcision to the Jew, are signs of inward workings of God. They are there to confirm our faith but they themselves aren’t the faith. 
    In this case, the sign was an indicator of man’s need for spiritual, or inward, cleansing. and the seal is an outward demonstration of the righteousness God had given to him by faith. 

  • 4:12
What do y’all think Paul is saying here?
    Paul is saying that we are Abraham’s legacy because we walk in the same faith that he walked in. 
    This has many implications but I will draw out just one of them for now.
    Given that Abraham is our forefather in the faith and walked in the way we now walk we can learn about our faith and how we should live by looking to Abraham. 
    Moreover, because Abraham is our forefather when we walk well/walk tall we not only honor the Triune God but also Abraham and David and all the other forefathers as well. Just something to think about next time you\’re feeling like you’re walking in a low valley. 

We will get to discuss what we can learn from Abraham and his faith in a moment. 

4:13-25

  • 4:13
IE Abraham isn’t justified by rite nor by keeping the law

  • 4:14
IE If the promises of God aren’t given by faith but are earned via adherents to the law then it\’s based on works and wages and thus faith is rather pointless. 
    Moreover, if only those who perfectly keep the law, an impossibility, receive the promise than faith has no value because the promise is based on an impossibility thus nullifying the promise.  
    It is those with the same faith/belief as Abraham that are his true children.

  • 4:15
The law shows us our sin. See chapter 2.

  • 4:16
“guaranteed” How sure or unsure of your salvation? Please explain your answer. 
[Let them answer. Ask follow up questions.] 

What would you say to someone who was unsure of their salvation? What comfort, rebuke, reassurance would you bring them?

    Here are just a few verses for your consideration:

    “But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds, we are healed”-Isaiah 53:5

    \”I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.”-Ezekiel 36:26

    “Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God- children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.”-John 1:12-13

    “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life”-John 3:16

    “In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who workout everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, in order that we, who were the first to put our hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory.”-Ephesians 1:11-12

    “But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.”-1 Peter 2:9

  • 4:17
Tell me what exactly happened in your conversion?
    As Paul put it\’s here, God gave life to you, the dead, and called into existence something that was nothing; IE spiritual life in you/faith. 
    Abraham experienced this when God gave him and his wife, Sarah who was 90 years old, a baby boy. God, in His power, called something, a baby, into existence that couldn’t have been there before His intervention.

  • 4:18
“In hope he believed against hope…” 
Let me ask y\’all this: Is faith blind? Why or why not?
    No. Faith is not a blind leap. Faith is the most reasonable thing in this world. Let me explain: 
    If God is all that He says He is: Good, true, and just and it is impossible for God to lie (Hebrew 6:18) then trusting and then doing whatever God says to do is the most secure and trustworthy thing you could do. 
    Everyone you will ever speak to is capable of lying to you; God can not lie for it is against His very nature. Thus to act on His sure word is wise, reasonable and trustworthy. 

With this said, what does it mean when Paul says “In hope he believed against hope”?
    IE Paul is saying that Abraham believed God and His promises because God is faithful to Himself and will fulfill His promises despite all physical evidence to the contrary; that is Abraham and Sara’s age. 

  • 4:19-20
How do we ensure that our faith, like Abraham’s, doesn’t grow weak in testing?
    A small, yet constant, drop of water can split even the strongest rocks; particularly in the winter when the water freezes.
    Our faith is weakened when we begin to trust in/act on our own doubts rather than what God has said in His word. 
    The purpose of doubt in the faith is this: to strengthen your faith. 
    To continue our illusion of the water and the rock: To counter water of doubt we must remain in the warm, bright light of the Lord’s radiant love toward His children. 
    Keeping His love ever-present in your mind will quickly evaporate whatever water of doubt there may be in your mind and shall prevent any cold winter trails from taking hold of you and breaking you as well. The Lord’s great and eternal love for you is the cure for doubt. 

  • 4:20
So not only did Abraham not grow weak (negative) he also “grow strong in his faith”. What does that mean?
    We remained true to God regardless of circumstances. 
    He actively chose to trust God over himself daily; thus we wish to grow strong in our faith we must do so as well; actively choosing to trust God and His promises to us daily. 

  • 4:21
“fully convinced” How does one become fully convinced of something? 
    They experience it. Thus, the more we experience God, and His love for us individually, in the midst of temptation and trail the more convinced of Him and His promises we’ll be. 

  • 4:22
IE He had genuine faith and thus it was indeed counted as righteous to him

  • 4:23-25
For whom was the story of Abraham recorded?
    For us as well as him.
    All of scripture as an application to us and our lives. Abraham’s experience is no exception. 
    I don’t know what yall\’s experience with reading your bible has been thus far but all of this is for your benefit. Keep reading, and asking great questions because that’s what this was written for. It was written for you to grow up in God and delight in Him forever. 

[Notice the connection that Paul is making with the “raised from the dead Jesus” and the God in whom Abraham believed, who gives life to the dead…” (4:17)]

“because of our justification”, the resurrection provided proof that God had accepted the sacrifice of His Son and would be able to be just and yet justify the ungodly through faith in Him.  

Romans 3

3:1-8
  • 3:1-3
Do y\’all understand Paul’s argument thus far? If so, please put it into your own words.
Paul is saying that the Jews had a great advantage over the Gentiles because they had the truth of God and the shadows of the Gospel with them. But, even though some physical descendants of Abraham were not repentant or faithful God is yet still faithful to those that believe inwardly rather than those that are merely outwardly faithful. See 2:28-29. 
IE God will fulfill all His promises He made to the true Jew even if individual Jews are not able to receive them because of their unbelief. 

  • 3:4
IE if everyone believed God was a lair it would make no difference because it would only prove that they are lairs and that God is true; regardless of their opinion. 

  • 3:5
So if God is going to get glory through my sin, or if my unrighteousness shows off His righteousness, then why should I change my ways?
The wrath of God is revealed against all ungodliness, its an abuse of His love/goodness towards us. 
What a great love Christ has for His people. Let us not be like the foolish heathen who disregard this great love from God but rather treasure and protect it from any worldly stain. 

  • 3:6
Why does God have the right to judge the world?
He is holy and perfectly moral. 
If God Himself winked at sin or condoned it, then He Himself is not righteous and therefore has no righteous basis for judgment on the world. 

  • 3:7-8
How is their condemnation just (3:8)? 
It would seem that some detractors of the faith accused Paul’s gospel message of salvation by grace through faith alone as a license to sin. The gospel is by no means a license to sin but a privilege of joyful holiness to those that believe. Those that preach that we can go on in sin dishonor God and abuse the gospel; thus their condemnation is indeed just. 

3:9-20
This section is one of two of the most challenging texts that I will ever teach y\’all tonight. Simply because I have to outright step on the line that I’m not supposed to cross. Where exactly we go with this text is 100% up to y\’all tonight. I will explain more on that in a moment. 

  • 3:9
So both Jew and Gentile are under the control and power of sin. And Paul is about to show us the depth of that enslavement to sin. See chapter 1 and 2 for further explanation of mankind’s condemnation. 

  • 3:10
What are yall\’s thoughts on man? Mostly good, all good, mostly bad, etc?
In 3:10-18 Paul strings together a series of OT quotes that how us the evil, or depravity, of man. He uses “all” and “none” to show the universality of our sin and rebellion against God. 

Fair warning: I will be using some of my own sect’s language to teach this portion of scripture; because, frankly, I don\’t know any other words to describe the condition of man. In the interest of fair play, you are all welcome to challenge me at any point and all further discussion at this point will totally rely on you as well as your definitions of what will be taught here tonight. 

Which that said, I introduce the theology term to y\’all called “total depravity”. 
The total depth of this doctrine will not be explored here (unless yall request otherwise). 
I use my doctrine tonight because if we want to love God, we must know God and know Him accurately. I use this term for the purpose of accuracy (and the fact that my vocabulary is far too limited to use any other word anyhow). Again, we’re going for accuracy not necessary depth tonight.  

So let\’s define our “big word” for tonight: 
What do yall think of when I say “total depravity”/what is yall’s definition of it?
For our purposes, our definition will be: the complete, or rather, total sinfulness of man in our hearts and minds. 
One could also refer to this doctrine as “complete corruption” of sinful man. 

While I’m on the topic of the sinful nature of man: tell me how did man become sinful/how did he get his sin nature?
Original sin. The sin of our first parents. We are sinners, by nature, and therefore sin. This is why we must be “born anew (John 3). 

What is yall\’s understanding of this teaching? Definition? Do you think you understand it well?
I ask because Romans 5 deals with the sin of Adam, his federal headship, and our sin. I was just curious about y’alls thoughts before I begin my prep work shortly. 

Paul will further teach this definition of the doctrine of total depravity for us tonight. 

  • 3:11
These set of verses, out of all the verses we’ve ever gone through, are perhaps the most damning verses to mankind. 

Let\’s focus on the “seeking” part of this verse. We’ve discussed “seeker-sensitive” worship in prior studies; given this verse what are yall\’s thoughts on such worship?
My opinion, I am actually pro seeker-sensitive worship. Christ says, “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him” (John 6:44). Worship is exclusively for those who seek God; AKA Christians. God is our God and Father and we have the right and privilege to worship Him as such. Our worship is just that *our* worship that is designed and directed by God in accordance with the word. 

So, given this verse as well as all that we have previously discussed in John and Ephesians, I ask an atomic bomb level question in which you are all in complete control of the forthcoming discussion: 
If none seek after God then how does anyone ever come to God? 
Ultimately it is the result of God working in man’s heart that man seeks Him. 
I encourage y’all to dive deeper into such matters in your own study. But I am always happy to discuss such matters at your convince. 

  • 3:12
“no one does good” Whats Paul mean here? How does man never do good when we see charities and good works readily in the world?
You’ll recall last weeks big term of “common grace” meaning God’s goodness to all men. One aspect of this goodness of God is His enabling of the Heathen to do “good deeds” for some end purpose of God. 

Moreover, good deeds must also include correct motivate for the deed to actually be good. No heathen is able to have proper motive by themselves; IE they’ll do good to puff themselves up and not SOLEY for the benefit of others. 

  • 3:13-14
Do y\’all know the story of the prophet of Isaiah in the OT?
In brief, Isaiah was a prophet of God for Israel right before Israel was to be conquered by the Babylonians and went into exile and slavery from their homeland. This was foreordained by God as punishment for Israel’s sins and unrepentant hearts. 

Do y\’all know the story of how Isaiah was called to his prophetic ministry?
Turn briefly to Isaiah chapter 6:1-7
A curious episode in the OT no doubt. 

What do yall notice in this passage? Characters? Actions/reactions? 
After Isaiah was shown the holiness of God his reaction is a lament with a focus on his lips. 

Why, out of all his sin/uncleanness, would Isaiah lament his unclean lips?
In short, the Lord teaches in Matthew 12:33-37,” Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad, for the tree is known by its fruit. 34You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. 35The good person out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil. 36 I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak, 37 for by your words you will be justified, and by your words, you will be condemned.\”

All that to say, Isaiah laments over his unclean lips because his lips reveal his clean heart which reveals his lack of knowing or fearing God. Paul, here in Romans 3, teaches the same thing; their lips are venomous/destructive because they have hearted hearts that don\’t know/fear God. 

Moreover, notice the words Paul uses to describe their speech, “open grave”. IE gross, smelly, useless. And later, “full of curses and bitterness”. 

I think one of the best methods of witnessing to the world is to 
1) not partake in their hideous discussion on things of the flesh and 
2) If you cannot physically walk away from such discussion give to laughter and pay little attention as possible to such talk of theirs. 

That was outwardly focused, on I speak inwardly: We, as kinsman in the faith, must be mindful of our speech towards ourselves in particular. As an explicit reminder, if you need encourage/exhortation or rebuke you are welcome to say so to any of us. If we are to love our neighbor as Christ commanded, let us also be mindful in loving our own family as Christ commanded. 

  • 3:15
IE we rush to sin

  • 3:16
We will never build a utopia. Everything natural man does comes to ruin. Or to quote one great man, \”Christ did not die for us to rebuild the tower of babel” (VD).

  • 3:17
Do you have peace? If so, how?
Through Christ. He is the peace offering between man and God. An internal and eternal peace.

I think one of the best evangelist mentions is to simply ask: where is your peace? For the heathen have none. 
It’s been said that since the start of history man, anywhere in the world, as never been at peace with one another. Whether this is true I don\’t know but the idea is true. We always lack inward, true peace. This is peace is given to us by God via the removal of our guilt; as Paul will explain in a bit. 

  • 3:18
How do yall define the “fear of God”?
Awe of His greatness and dread of His holy wrath. 

Have y’all ever heard of someone explaining the “fear of God” as a literal fear?
I have. Only once though.

It’s just confusing to me; if “fear” is just high reverence then why not just say “high reverence” in the text. 

  • 3:19
This verse is a kind of summary of chapter 1-3 where Paul reiterates that Jews received the written law through Moses (3:2) and the Gentiles have the works of the law written on their hearts (2:15) so that both are accountable before God. 
And there is no defense against the guilty verdict that God pronounces on mankind.
I’d also recommend marking this verse down and noting it when Jacob leads us in Romans 9:14-18 as well as Romans 11:26-27; because here is the idea of silence before a holy God and I bet you I’ll reference this again for one of those two chapters.

  • 3:20
And here we have something like a thesis for the new paragraph of Paul’s writing.

Tell me, why would God want us to have a knowledge of sin? 
So that we might know sin and thus know of our inability to save ourselves from it and flee to Christ. 

  • 3:21-26
And now we get to the Gospel. After 3 hard-hitting chapters of Paul systematically dismantling any hope for the salvation for the sinner apart from Christ. Paul now fleshes out the gospel by showing us how God is just while justifying the unjust through Jesus’ blood. We also we the design of the sacrifice of Christ but that\’s another matter. 

  • 3:21 
So what’s Paul saying here? Put this verse in your own words
God’s justice is shown through an extraordinary means through one who fulfills the law and the law testifies to this “one”. It is a sufficient and efficient fulfillment for salvation. 

  • 3:22
What are we to have faith in?
Christ as the substitutionary sacrifice for our sin. God bestows His righteousness on all who believe, be that Jew or gentile. 

  • 3:23
What does it mean to “fall short of the glory of God”?
Like trying to jump across the grand canyon; some get closer than others sure but no one made it; all failed to achieve such glory.

  • 3:24
What are some implications as to this gift of grace?
It\’s a gift, therefore unearned or un-merited; it cannot be added to nor taken away by the receiver. 

And what is the result of this unearned gift of grace?
Justification. A legal term meaning to “declare righteous/in right stating”. 
This verdict includes: pardon from the guilt and penalty of sin and a transference/imputation of the believers sin to Christ’s account in His death and imputation of Christ’s perfect obedience to us Christians. 

And to whom is this justifying gift of grace given to?
Those who have faith in Christ alone; the only hope of justification before a holy God. 

  • 3:25
For whom did Christ die?
In one way, Christians. In another sense, God because He was the sacrifice toward God. 
“whole God put forward” God planned and executed our salvation through the sin of the Jews. 

What’s “propitiation” mean?
Appeasement or satisfaction. IE Christ’s violent death satisfied the offended holiness of God against those for who Christ died. 

“forbearance” see 2:4-5. 

“passed over” God is not indifferent toward sin; He merely withholds judgment for a certain period of time. Also, keep this “passed over” idea in mind for Romans 9; we’ll need it then. 

  • 3:26
How does God maintain His perfect justice while pardoning the condemned?
Through Christ. God is both just and justifier in that the wisdom of God’s plan allowed Him to punish Jesus in the place of sinners and thereby justify those who are guilt without compromising His justice. God is both just and justifier so that the saved sinner can be Simul Justus et Peccator: Simultaneously just and sinner. IE in one sense we are just in another we are sinners. We are sinners but Jesus’ imputed righteousness to us makes us just with God and we are reconciled to God. 

3:27-30
  • 3:27
How do we remind humble in the faith?
We remember we contribute nothing to our salvation but look to God and be thankful that He provided all things necessary for our salvation for us in the sacrifice of Christ. 

  • 3:28
I’m curious does anyone’s bible render this as “faith alone”?
Sola Fide. Faith alone is the main point of this chapter, if not all of Romans, it just further underscores Paul’s point. Our faith received Jesus and all He has done for us and it looks away from ourselves and toward God. 

  • 3:29
IE God justifies all who believe. We must always remember the simplicity of salvation, it is immeasurably rich, but simple. Do you believe in Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of God? Yes? Then God is for you and you for God; be at ease and enjoy Him for all He is to you. 

  • 3:30
Why does Paul want us to uphold the law?
Paul knew that he would be accused of antinomianism (being against the law) for arguing that a man was justified apart from keeping the law. Paul is merely introducing his defense to that accusation here and will develop it in ch. 6-7. 
This salvation by grace through faith does not denigrate the law but rather underscores it importance 
1)by providing a payment for the penalty of death which the law required for failing to keep it 
2) by fulfilling the law’s original purpose which is to serve as a teacher to show man’s utter inability to obey God’s righteous demands and to drive us to Christ 
3) by giving believers the capacity to obey it (Romans 8:1-4). 

Thus far, Paul has shown us our sin and inability to save ourselves and has just introduced us to the instrument by which we’re saved, faith, and who that faith is placed in, Jesus and all that He has done for His people. Paul will further show us how this works by looking to Abraham in the OT next week.